⇒ A claimant must prove that the damage was not only caused by the defendant but that it was not too remote
⇒Historical position on remoteness: Re Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co [1921]
⇒The current law on remoteness: Overseas Tankship v Morts Dock (The Wagon Mound (No 1)) [1961]
⇒ Numerous cases have followed the principle in The Wagon Mound that a harm suffered by the claimant must be of a kind, type, or class that was reasonably foreseeable as a result of the defendant's negligence
⇒ See, for example, Bradford v Robinson Rentals [1967], where it was said that as the claimant suffered an injury that was similar to the kinds of damages to be expected from the defendants' action, they could be found liable
⇒ However, notwithstanding the apparent simplicity for the remoteness of damage, there has been some uncertainty as to how wide the category of ‘kind of damage’ should be viewed/defined:
⇒ Since the Wagon Mound case, the courts have frequently reiterated that the defendant may be liable even where he/she could not envisage the precise set of circumstances which caused the harm of a foreseeable type. In other words, if it is foreseeable that the claimant will suffer a particular injury (e.g. a burn), then even if the circumstances in which the claimant got that injury are not foreseeable, it will not matter and the defendant will be liable
⇒ The egg shell skull principle is the principle that makes a defendant liable for the claimant's unfortunate and uncommon reaction to the defendant's negligent/intentional tort.
⇒ See the cases of Smith v Leech Brain & Co. Ltd. [1962], Robinson v Post Office [1974] , and Page v Smith [1996]
FOOL-PROOF methods of obtaining top grades
SECRETS your professors won't tell you and your peers don't know
INSIDER TIPS and tricks so you can spend less time studying and land the perfect job
We work really hard to provide you with incredible law notes for free...
The proceeds of this eBook helps us to run the site and keep the service FREE!
⇒ It may be possible that a third party intervenes in such a way that breaks the defendant's causation of the claimant's injury
⇒ Natural or ‘instinctive’ interventions by a third party
⇒ Negligent Interventions by a third party
⇒ Intentional intervention by a third party
⇒ Intervening act of the claimant him/herself
Learn how to effortlessly land vacation schemes, training contracts, and pupillages by making your law applications awesome. This eBook is constructed by lawyers and recruiters from the world's leading law firms and barristers' chambers.
✅ 60+ page eBook
✅ Research Methods, Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more!
✅ Help keep Digestible Notes FREE